Common-Essay-Questions

Term Paper Assignment on Healthcare Ethics

Posted On Mar 03 2021

TERM PAPER ASSIGNMENT Each student will select a topic to prepare a research paper on. The paper should be five to seven single spaced pages long, with a bibliography of at least five sources. Subject matters are to be selected in consultation with the instructor on a topical ethical health care issue. Examples include but are not limited to the following: 1. Cochlear implants; 2. H.I.V. /A.I.D.S. partner notification (preventing harm versus confidentiality); 3. Legal paternalism issues (pick just one such as smoking restrictions, seat belt requirements, use of hand held devises in automobiles, or mandatory workplace drug testing (blood, urine, etc.) 4. Mandatory vaccinations; 5. Medicinal use of marijuana; 6. Opt-In or Opt-out system for organ donations; 7. Physician assisted suicide; 8. Surrogate motherhood; 9. Therapeutic cloning; 10. Using Nazi research. The paper should include at a minimum the following sections: A. Background explanation of the ethical issue; (Be sure to include a brief summary of the arguments for and against). B. Reference, cite and explain the current legal status of the topic (cases, statutes, and/or proposed statutes, etc.); C. Reference and discuss at least two authors’ opposing (i.e.one for and one against) perspectives of the ethical issues raised by the topic; D. Argue at least two opposing (i.e.one for and one against) ethical perspectives of the issue utilizing at least two of the ethical theories and principles cited in the course readings. These ethical theories and principles (consequentialism, utilitarianism, deontologism, virtue ethics, autonomy, paternalism, double effect, and honesty) are all contained in the materials for weeks one through four. E. The conclusion weighs the two approaches taken in the paper and then uses ethical reasoning to assess which approach makes the most sense. As you work on your paper feel free to consult with the instructor around any problems or concerns. Rubric for Assessment of Term Paper Due February 7: 1. Background explanation of the ethical issue. (Preliminary Version) a. Clearly articulated and insightful with a sense of purpose. (15 points) (Be sure to include a brief summary of the arguments for and against). b. The presentation of the ethical issue may be strongly articulated, insightful, or purposeful, but fails to be all three. (12 points) c. Focuses more on substantive health issue not the ethical issue. (9 points) d. Hard to tell what the ethical issue is. (6 points) Due February 28: 2. Reference, cite and explain the current legal status of the topic (cases, statutes, and/or proposed statutes, etc. (Preliminary Version). a. Legal reference is relevant for the ethical issue, timely, and explained clearly. (20 points) b. Legal reference is relevant for the ethical issue, timely, and/or explained clearly, but fails to do all three. (15 points) c. Reference is not particularly appropriate for the ethical issue. (10 points) d. No legal reference is cited. (0 points) Due March 21: 3. Reference and discuss at least two author’s opposing (i.e.one for and one against) perspectives of the ethical issues raised by the topic. (Preliminary Version) a. The two authors’ opposing perspectives were relevant, balanced and discussed in an insightful manner. (20 points) b. The two authors’ opposing perspectives were relevant, balanced and/or discussed in an insightful manner, but not all three. (15 points) c. Only one relevant author and/or ethical perspective was referenced. (10 points) d. No authors’ ethical perspectives were referenced. (0 points) Due April 11: 4. Argue two opposing (i.e.one for and one against) ethical perspectives of the issue utilizing at least two of the ethical theories and principles cited in the course materials. (Preliminary Version) a. The two ethical theories or principles were relevant, balanced and discussed in an insightful manner. (20 points) b. The two ethical theories or principles were relevant, balanced and/or discussed in an insightful manner, but not all three. (15 points) c. Only one relevant ethical theory or principle was referenced. (10 points) d. No relevant ethical theories or principles were referenced. (0 points) Due April 25: Final Version of Full Paper 1. Background explanation of the ethical issue. a. Clearly articulated and insightful with a sense of purpose. (3 points) Be sure to include a summary of the arguments for and against. b. The presentation of the ethical issue may be strongly articulated, insightful, or purposeful, but fails to be all three. (2 points) c. Focuses more on substantive health issue not the ethical issue. (1 point) d. Hard to tell what the ethical issue is. (0 points) 2. Reference, cite and explain the current legal status of the topic (cases, statutes, and/or proposed statutes, etc. a. Legal reference is relevant for the ethical issue, timely, and explained clearly. (3 points) b. Legal reference is relevant for the ethical issue, timely, and/or explained clearly, but fails to do all three. (2 points) c. Reference is not particularly appropriate for the ethical issue. (1 point) d. No legal reference is cited. (0 points) 3. Reference and discuss two author’s opposing (i.e.one for and one against) perspectives of the ethical issues raised by the topic. a. The two authors’ opposing perspectives were relevant, balanced and discussed in an insightful manner. (3 points) b. The two authors’ opposing perspectives were relevant, balanced and/or discussed in an insightful manner, but not all three. (2 points) c. Only one relevant author and/or ethical perspective was referenced. (1 point) d. No authors’ ethical perspectives were referenced. (0 points) 4. Argue two opposing (i.e.one for and one against) ethical perspectives of the issue utilizing at least two of the ethical theories and principles cited in the course text. a. The two ethical theories or principles were relevant, balanced and discussed in an insightful manner. (3 points) b. The two ethical theories or principles were relevant, balanced and/or discussed in an insightful manner, but not all three. (2 points) c. Only one relevant ethical theory or principle was referenced. (1 point) d. No relevant ethical theories or principles were referenced. (0 points) 5. Conclusion a. The conclusion weighs the two approaches taken in the paper and then uses ethical reasoning to assess which approach makes the most sense. (8 points) b. The conclusion is reasonable and supported within the paper; however, it is not made clear why other perspectives were discounted. (5 points) c. The conclusion seems to be weighted heavily from an opinionated as opposed to a researched point of view. (2 points) d. There is no conclusion. (0 points) 6. a. The paper is five to seven single spaced pages. (2.5 points) b. A bibliography with a minimum of five references is included (2.5 points)


Our expert tutors in the field will help at a penny price!



Order Now



Womans Rights

Women's activism in the abolitionist movement challenged the concepts of the "True Woman" and separate spheres in two fundamental ways: first, it moved women into the previously all-male public/political sphere; and second, it led some women to



Evaluate The Significance That Primary Productivity

Explain the significance of the figure. Relate the significance to the broader context of environmental chemistry including external research with a peer-reviewed citation. For library information, refer to the course syllabus.





Phase Transport And Relationship (Ksp[ And Phase Transport/

Define the second term- PhaseTransport in relation to environmental pollution Describe in detail the relationship between the two terms( Solubility Product Constant-Ksp and Phase transport. How pollutant is moving from one phase to others







ADVANCED BIOCHEMISTRY Questions

The glucocorticoid receptor recognizes cortisol and other steroid hormones, which triggers its association with DNA and affecting the transcription of several genes. The glucocorticoid receptor (GRE) is upregulated in several types of cancer, notably vari





The Impact Of COVID-19 On Mental Health

COVID-19 has impacted many and communities of color at a higher risk of issues stemming from the virus. While the paper is general, it should highlight the impact of of COVID-19 on Mental Health in communities of color, contributing factors (unemployment



Impact Of Covid 19 On Civil Aviation

Sample project and analysis from our instructor which you need to follow specially the layout and arrangements. 2- the rubrics excel sheets which you need to take in concern as I need an A in this course please. 3- The main article that you need to rel



This website uses cookies to improove user experience.

X